Unity Isn’t the Default State of a Community
Or, the politics of victimhood
👋 Hey there! My name is Abhishek. Welcome to a new edition of The Sunday Wisdom! This is the best way to learn new things with the least amount of effort.
It’s a collection of weekly explorations and inquiries into many curiosities, such as business, human nature, society, and life’s big questions. My primary goal is to give you some new perspective to think about things.
Note: If you find this issue valuable, can you do me a favour and click the little grey heart below my name (above)? It helps get the word out about this budding newsletter. 😍
Today, let’s talk about politics. More precisely, the mechanics of politics that has to do with human psychology — why it works and why it’s here to stay.
As much as we dislike them, cast, religious, and linguistic sentiments are central in politics. We cannot comprehend how ingrained these identities are, especially in a culturally diverse nation such as India. And… as much as we would hate to admit, the divide in society along caste and religious lines aren’t disappearing anytime soon.
The instinct to think like a herd has been prevalent in human beings since prehistoric times. Even a smalltime politician knows that if they can tap into this sentiment, they would become massively popular within the group. We refer to identity politics — pitting one group against another — as dirty politics, and if you ask me, this has been highly successful historically, and not without good reason.
In the recent West Bengal Legislative Assembly election, the most obvious flaw that anyone could identify with the BJP campaign was the lack of local leadership. The faces of the campaign were Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, who, even though popular figures, cannot speak a word of Bengali. On the other hand, Mamata Banerjee, the TMC leader (and Chief Minister of the incumbent govt.) is a local, which TMC’s campaign successfully asserted while also establishing that BJP is a party of outsiders. However, this regionalist sentiment in West Bengal is negligible compared to other states of India.
For example, there’s presence of a strong anti-Hindi sentiment in south India, especially in the state of Tamil Nadu, which has its roots in pre-independent India. In 1937, when C. Rajagopalachari became the Chief Minister of Madras Presidency (under the British rule), he introduced Hindi as a compulsory language of study in schools, thereby igniting a series of anti-Hindi protests by social activist Periyar E. V. Ramasamy.
The movement soon escalated into the creation of regional parties that embodied Tamil pride. Periyar later founded the Dravidar Kazhagam, whose goal was to establish a Dravida Nadu (Dravidian nation) — further solidifying regionalist sentiments.
Later attempts to impose Hindi as the national language in 1965 by the Indian Govt. only strengthened the anti-Hindi movement. It consolidated voters across south India against the political domination of Congress (the then ruling party), which they viewed as a north Indian party. This regionalist sentiment has dominated Tamil Nadu’s politics ever since.
Today, as Shivam Shankar Singh writes in How to Win an Indian Election, most parties are identified with a particular community, caste, or religion in India. The major problem with such parties is that they often have to rely upon a sense of victimhood to keep their voters unified.
Unity isn’t the default state of a community. Some external factor, usually a common enemy, is needed to make people aware of their common identity and unite as a group (or a vote bank).
The fastest way to create a vote bank is to instil a sense of victimhood. Periyar’s anti-Hindi, Tamil pride agitations were a success because people felt aggrieved. It presented the community as a victim of some form of oppression. A feeling of having been denied justice is the fastest way to unite a community against a common foe, implant as sense of “us vs. them” mentality, and consolidate it into a political force.
This was the primary weapon of Donald Trump during the 2016 US elections. The Trump campaign worked to unify its supporters against immigrants, who could easily be blamed for Americans losing jobs. The campaign also tapped into the fear that Islam already produced in the minds of Trump’s core supporters. It only magnified the threat. The campaign was also able to successfully consolidate votes from people who suffered the most due to the worsening economy, who felt that mainstream politicians had let them down, who felt they needed to shake things up. Donald Trump simply gave these people a common foe, someone to blame for all their problems, i.e., the incumbent govt., and they united in a jiffy.
In India, the Dalit community represents one of the strongest voting banks in the country. The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) was founded in 1984 to support causes of the community, but it soon turned into a political force, especially in the state of Uttar Pradesh. In 1995, the whole community rallied behind Mayawati, propelling her to the post of Chief Minister.
A major cause of this consolidation is the strong discontent in the community due to historic injustice and a strong persistent feeling of victimhood — which isn’t unfounded, unlike Trump’s propaganda against Islam.
But as Trump has shown, you don’t need the truth, as long as you have a good story to instil a sense of victimhood within a community. Asaduddin Owaisi’s All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) and Badruddin Ajmal’s All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) are examples of parties that have unified Muslims based on their fear of Hindus instead of a message of socio-economic upliftment of the community. In a similar vein, the BJP has attempted to consolidate Hindu voters through messaging based on a fear of Muslims.
To beat BSP (that had a stronghold over caste-based vote banks throughout the country), the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) started establishing an entirely new ‘Hindu’ vote bank. They had their watershed moment by participating in the Ram Janmabhoomi movement.
Ram Janmabhoomi (Rama’s birthplace), as some Hindus claim, is where the Babri Masjid stood in present-day Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The message that the mosque was built over a Ram temple that was destroyed was used to rake up a historic wrong against the Hindu community. This led to the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992, triggering riots all over India, resulting in the death of around ~2,000 people, and a never-ending Hindu-Muslim strife.
But this helped the BJP shape itself into a party that fights for ‘Hindu causes’ while branding its opposition as parties that indulge in ‘Muslim appeasement’. The 2014 general election; the 2017 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election (where the BJP won without fielding a single Muslim candidate); followed by the general election in 2019 has renewed the party’s faith in the political merit of appealing to majoritarian sentiments, and they aren’t backing down anytime soon.
Trump doubled down on his anti-Islam campaign rhetoric despite receiving widespread criticism from liberal Americans. It’s because he knew his message resonated with the people who were going to vote for him, and that liberal Americans wouldn’t vote for him either way, so why bother. This is true for the BJP as well.
Even though politics is a good (and easy) example to illustrate the power of victimhood, it’s prevalent in businesses as well. For example, Basecamp rallies support from small businesses all over the world in a similar fashion. They brand themselves as a company that fight for the causes of the little guys, and their anti-VC, anti-Silicon Valley, anti-Fortune 500 companies is a well-planned and extremely well-executed scheme.
The ability to unite against a common foe has helped human beings to overcome the impossible — achieve independence, overthrow dictatorships, and win wars. But it’s a double-edged sword that can rally us towards the wrong cause as well, unless we are careful.
If I have to be completely honest, victimhood is a weapon that’s being used against us on a daily basis, in some form or the other. It’s such an easy tactic that only an irrational idealist would think of not using it, and as we all know, idealists neither make good politicians nor businessmen.
Interesting Finds
At some point in your career, you may well be advised to seek out a mentor. However, the benefits of being a mentor are often overlooked. You don’t need to know everything about a subject to get started. If you’re one or two steps further along than someone else, you’re in a position to help them. Plus, it feels pretty good to help others out!
Third generation CAR-T immunotherapy treatments aim to be more effective with less side effects than previous therapies. Dr Robert Weinkove is a key member of the Cancer Immunotherapy Programme to develop and manufacture ‘chimeric antigen receptor’ (CAR) T-cells for treatment of lymphoma and other blood cancers.
Almost 20 years on from the Pyrenean ibex and 25 years from Dolly the sheep, the field of genetics is still replete with mysteries. It may be too late to save some animals from extinction, but Tullis Matson has a backup plan: freeze their cells to preserve their genes. “I’m afraid that people will start obsessing over Jurassic Park and forget that we want to save animals that are alive now,” he says. “It’s just not about that.”
How you can experience the Narayan Effect. Whether you seek to experience water’s potential for physical healing or mental and emotional balance, these are a few ways you can experiment with this powerful form of therapy.
Friendlessness is on the rise — and so is loneliness. It might seem strange that the absence of friendship in the lives of individuals could be paving the way for the gravest forms of political misfortune. Loneliness can be intolerable — so much so that even the most toxic forms of political association begin to look like a godsend.
Cricket is having its Moneyball moment. When Twenty20 launched, the game of cricket changed forever. Now a team of data evangelists are taking the sport to the next level.
When the ultimate dream of becoming the central star of corporate culture comes true, a new star is born. But who can maintain this kind of hyper-performative life? Is it even possible to be excellent, extraordinary, creative and innovative all day long? How long can a shift of performative work be anyway?
Quote to Note
In the end, people don’t view their life as merely the average of all its moments—which, after all, is mostly nothing much plus some sleep. For human beings, life is meaningful because it is a story. A story has a sense of a whole, and its arc is determined by the significant moments, the ones where something happens. Measurements of people’s minute-by-minute levels of pleasure and pain miss this fundamental aspect of human existence. A seemingly happy life maybe empty. A seemingly difficult life may be devoted to a great cause. We have purposes larger than ourselves.
— Atul Gawande, Being Mortal
Talk to Me
Do you agree with what I said, or do you think otherwise? Send me counters, comments, questions, and your favourite memes. 🤜🤛
Until next Sunday,
Abhishek 👋
Great article.
The aim of any political party has to win the election and get the power to carry out their manifesto. So it is assumed that the parties will project their ideas to capture the votes ideologically.
However, it has not happened like that in India. While the freedom movement captured the imagination and zeal of the people irrespective of religion or caste, that binding factor disappeared after India got freedom.
The undeniable fact is that every government till 2014 was elected only by combinations vote banks of local herds with religious minorities. It is the avowed purpose of both the Abrahamic religions, which are not native to this country, to capture power and rule the country as ideoogical states and to wipe out Hinduism.
Hindu religion is diverse and has no common purpose of capturing power or ruling the country as a Hindu nation. What happened in 2014 is only an awakening and a backlash for the politics of religion played by the politicians with western makeup.
Even now in Bengal, Hindus do not seem to have voted as a vote bank whereas the other religions were very cohesive. The fact is that the place is overrun with intruders from neighboring country. On the other hand there is opposition to fast track citizenship for Hindus fleeing from persecution. Are they playing victimhood?
It is too simplistic to call it victimhood or playing the victim by only one party as the picture seems to imply. Congress has played it all along and cries fowl when others copy their strategy. You are perhaps right in pointing out that some common purpose is required to make a vote bank and maybe victimhood is one used by the minority religions for that purpose. Have you considered the fact that many Muslims in public space have Hindu names like Dilip Kumar and many Reddys in Andhra are actually Christians?
Similarly Ramjanmabhoomi is not 'raked up' - it was there from the day India got freedom and it is a people's movement which was later supported by the parties. What prevented the Muslims from conceding the historical fact that a temple there was demolished? They could have taken the wind out of the sails of the so called Hindu parties.
What we require is electoral reform and until a good system of representation is found the will of the real majority will never be known.
As long as we are a secular country, any talk of religious minority or religious representation in government is untenable.
Somehow even the title of your article sounds biased as if there is only one party that plays dirty politics. I am attracted to your site only because you are promising clear thinking and somehow this piece has become muddled, if you don't mind my saying so. There seems to be a propaganda war going on and I only wish that a clear thinking person will not fall into that trap.